Why were flagellants important

In virtually every textbook the Bubonic Plague, which is spread by flea-ridden rats, is named as the culprit behind the chaos.

But mounting evidence suggests that an Ebola-like virus was the actual cause of the Black Death and the sporadic outbreaks that occurred in the following years. The example of the Black Death can be inspiring for dealing with challenges caused by the outbreak of epidemics in our contemporary world. Unlike in the 14th century, today we can identify new viruses, sequence their genome, and develop reliable tests for diseases in just a few weeks.

It's deadly without treatment. It's also very contagious because the plague can spread through the air when a person coughs. Symptoms include: Cough, sometimes with blood. Why is flagellants significant? Asked by: Dr. Anderson Jast MD. How many people died from the Black plague? Why did flagellants end? What impact did the flagellants have? How did the church respond to the Black Plague? How did Black Death End? Did anyone recover from the Black Death?

Is the Black Plague still around? Why did flagellants cover their faces? What were Buboes? Who were the flagellants How did they attempt to avoid the plague?

How did the Black Death affect feudalism? How long did the black plague last? Using these whips they beat and whipped their bare skin until their bodies were bruised and swollen and blood rained down, spattering the walls nearby. I have seen, when they whipped themselves, how sometimes those bits of metal penetrated the skin so deeply that it took more than two attempts to pull them out.

Flagellants also had to avoid speaking, have no contact with the opposite sex, avoid shaving, bathing or changing their clothes, and to sleep on straw. Some foolish women had clothes ready to catch the blood and smear it on their eyes, saying it was miraculous blood. October — the month that Pope Clement VI proclaimed that the Flagellants were not following the rules of the Church, excommunicating many.

In fact, the great outburst of , while, perhaps, more widespread and more formidable than similar fanaticisms, was but one of a series of popular upheavals at irregular intervals from until the end of the fifteenth century. The generating cause of these movements was always an obscure amalgam of horror of corruption, of desire to imitate the heroic expiations of the great penitents, of apocalyptic vision, of despair at the prevailing corruption in Church and State. All these things are smouldering in the minds of the much-tried populace of Central Europe.

It needed but a sufficient occasion, such as the accumulated tyranny of some petty ruler, the horror of a great plague, or the ardent preaching of some saintly ascetic, to set the whole of Christendom in a blaze. Like fire the impulse ran through the people, and like fire it died down, only to break out here and there anew. At the beginning of each outbreak, the effects were generally good. Enemies were reconciled, debts were paid, prisoners were released, ill-gotten goods were restored.

But it was the merest revivalism, and, as always, the reaction was worse than the former stagnation. Sometimes the movement was more than suspected of being abused for political ends, more often it exemplified the fatal tendency of emotional pietism to degenerate into heresy.

The Flagellant movement was but one of the manias that afflicted the end of the Middle Ages ; others were the dancing-mania, the Jew -baiting rages, which the Flagellant processions encouraged in , the child-crusades, and the like. And, according to the temperament of the peoples among whom it spread, the movement became a revolt and a fantastic heresy , a rush of devotion settling soon into pious practices and good works , or a mere spectacle that aroused the curiosity or the pity of the onlookers.

Although as a dangerous heresy the Flagellants are not heard of after the fifteenth century, their practices were revived again and again as a means of quite orthodox public penance. On Holy Thursday of that year he organized a great procession from the Augustinians to Notre-Dame, in which all the great dignitaries of the realm were obliged to take part in company with himself.

The laughter of the Parisians, however, who treated the whole thing as a jest, obliged the king to withdraw his patronage. Early in the seventeenth century, the scandals arising among these brotherhoods caused the Parliament of Paris to suppress them, and under the combined assaults of the law , the Gallicans, and the sceptics , the practice soon died out.

Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Flagellant processions and self-flagellation were encouraged by the Jesuits in Austria and the Netherlands , as well as in the far countries which they evangelized. In Italy generally and in the Tyrol similar processions survived until the early years of the nineteenth century; in Rome itself they took place in the Jesuit churches as late as , while even later they occurred in parts of Tuscany and Sicily.

Always, however, these later Flagellant processions have taken place under the control of ecclesiastical authority, and must by no means he connected with the heretical epidemic of the later Middle Ages. It contains full and excellent bibliographies. APA citation. Toke, L. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. MLA citation. Toke, Leslie. New York: Robert Appleton Company, This article was transcribed for New Advent by Douglas J.

Dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ. Ecclesiastical approbation. Nihil Obstat. September 1, Remy Lafort, Censor. Farley, Archbishop of New York. Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is webmaster at newadvent.